Rediff.com

 
Ads by Google
Latensy Flash Graph
 Usa, NY, New York
 Usa, Florida, Tampa
 Germany, Frankfurt
 Canada, Montreal
 United Kingdom, Gloucester
Learn more at Latency Testing Profile
Separate test for different locations, time frames
The chart will appear within this DIV. This text will be replaced by the chart.
 Usa, NY, New York
 Usa, Florida, Tampa
 Germany, Frankfurt
 Canada, Montreal
 United Kingdom, Gloucester
Learn more at DNS Testing Profile
Separate test for different locations, time frames
Learn more at PageSpeed Testing Profile

WebSite Speed Profile

Site Speed Success Formula = good website latency + fast DNS lookup + high page load speed.
Site Speed Laboratory offers analysis of DNS Lookup speed & latency tests (ping) & Page Load speed for every website. Our analysis is based on data for May 25 2011. Since the first of July 2010 we carried out 23 tests from locations
for the main page of this website, the last of which were made about 3629 hours ago

Tests Summary

Latency Summary

DNS Summary

Page Speed Summary

Site Speed Laboratory Summary for this website

Location Ping Ping,
change
DNS Lookup DNS Resolve,
change
Page Speed Page Speed,
change
 Usa
NY, New York 27 ms 40 % 65 ms 26 % 24.17 Kb/s 7%
Florida, Tampa 6 ms 91 ms 32 %
 Germany
Frankfurt 29 ms 53 ms 60 %
 Canada
Montreal 11 ms 9 ms
 United Kingdom
Gloucester 12 ms 8 ms

Summary Widget

SiteSpeedLab Overall Website Rating for this website
Based on our speed test results table and considering features of the current webserver location (United states, Cambridge), we concluded
overall This website speed rank is 11. That means 11% of the sites from the Cambridge are slower for visitors than this website.

It is important to understand that you can't evaluate website speed without considering website audience location. You should evaluate the speed of the site considering location of your primary audience (visitors), and not just from abstract tests from various points of the planet. There is a chance that your website is quite slow for visitors from German but pretty quick for Australian users at the same time. Based on a primary audience location data Site Speed Laboratory maintains objective rating.

You should not overestimate the importance of the website speed factor. Google has more than 200 ranking factors and website speed is just one of them.

Graph Milestones

Milestones indicate the approximate date when the Web server was moved from one location to another. We specifically did not perform measurements at the time of the move (DNS requests may receive a different IP for the same domain from different locations, where the testing servers are located). Therefore we have the graph with two or more segments. It's a data measured before and after webserver was moved to the new location.
  Date Country, City Hosting IP
Milestone ® 25.05.2011 From Europe
to United States, Cambridge
From Akamai Technologies
to Akamai Technologies
88.221.94.89 to 184.84.248.49
Milestone ­ 25.05.2011 From United States, Cambridge
to Europe
From Akamai Technologies
to Akamai Technologies
96.17.106.80 to 88.221.94.89
Milestone ¬ 25.05.2011 From Sweden
to United States, Cambridge
From Teliasonera Ab
to Akamai Technologies
80.239.206.32 to 96.17.106.80
Milestone « 25.05.2011 From United States, Kalamazoo
to Sweden
From Akamai Technologies
to Teliasonera Ab
72.246.43.11 to 80.239.206.32
Milestone ª 25.05.2011 From United States, Cambridge
to United States, Kalamazoo
From Akamai Technologies
to Akamai Technologies
184.84.248.49 to 72.246.43.11
Milestone © 21.05.2011 From Europe
to United States, Cambridge
From Akamai Technologies
to Akamai Technologies
92.123.153.40 to 184.84.248.49
Milestone ¨ 21.05.2011 From United States, Weehawken
to Europe
From Akamai Technologies
to Akamai Technologies
72.246.25.10 to 92.123.153.40
Milestone § 21.05.2011 From Sweden
to United States, Weehawken
From Teliasonera Ab
to Akamai Technologies
80.239.206.32 to 72.246.25.10
Milestone ¦ 21.05.2011 From United States, Cambridge
to Sweden
From Akamai Technologies
to Teliasonera Ab
184.84.248.49 to 80.239.206.32
Milestone ¥ 16.05.2011 From Europe
to United States, Cambridge
From Akamai Technologies
to Akamai Technologies
195.245.127.137 to 184.84.248.49
Milestone ¤ 16.05.2011 From United States, Cambridge
to Europe
From Akamai Technologies
to Akamai Technologies
96.17.106.80 to 195.245.127.137
Milestone £ 16.05.2011 From Europe
to United States, Cambridge
From Akamai Technologies
to Akamai Technologies
92.122.212.33 to 96.17.106.80
Milestone ¢ 16.05.2011 From United States, Cambridge
to Europe
From Akamai Technologies
to Akamai Technologies
184.84.248.49 to 92.122.212.33
Milestone ¡ 11.05.2011 From Europe
to United States, Cambridge
From Akamai Technologies
to Akamai Technologies
88.221.84.75 to 184.84.248.49
Milestone   11.05.2011 From United States, Cambridge
to Europe
From Akamai Technologies
to Akamai Technologies
96.17.106.80 to 88.221.84.75
Milestone Ÿ 11.05.2011 From United States, Englewood
to United States, Cambridge
From Ntt America
to Akamai Technologies
168.143.241.10 to 96.17.106.80
Milestone ž 11.05.2011 From United States, Cambridge
to United States, Englewood
From Akamai Technologies
to Ntt America
72.247.244.96 to 168.143.241.10
Milestone 11.05.2011 From United States, Englewood
to United States, Cambridge
From Ntt America
to Akamai Technologies
168.143.241.10 to 72.247.244.96
Milestone œ 06.05.2011 From Europe
to United States, Englewood
From Akamai Technologies
to Ntt America
92.123.153.40 to 168.143.241.10
Milestone › 06.05.2011 From United States, Cambridge
to Europe
From Akamai Technologies
to Akamai Technologies
96.17.106.80 to 92.123.153.40
Milestone š 06.05.2011 From Europe
to United States, Cambridge
From Akamai Technologies
to Akamai Technologies
92.122.212.33 to 96.17.106.80
Milestone ™ 06.05.2011 From Sweden
to Europe
From Teliasonera Ab
to Akamai Technologies
80.239.206.32 to 92.122.212.33
Milestone ˜ 06.05.2011 From United States, Englewood
to Sweden
From Ntt America
to Teliasonera Ab
168.143.241.10 to 80.239.206.32
Milestone — 02.05.2011 From Europe
to United States, Englewood
From Akamai Technologies
to Ntt America
92.123.153.40 to 168.143.241.10
Milestone – 02.05.2011 From United States, Cambridge
to Europe
From Akamai Technologies
to Akamai Technologies
96.17.106.80 to 92.123.153.40
Milestone • 02.05.2011 From Europe
to United States, Cambridge
From Akamai Technologies
to Akamai Technologies
92.122.212.33 to 96.17.106.80
Milestone ” 02.05.2011 From United States, Cambridge
to Europe
From Akamai Technologies
to Akamai Technologies
96.7.40.16 to 92.122.212.33
Milestone “ 26.04.2011 From Europe
to United States, Cambridge
From Akamai Technologies
to Akamai Technologies
92.123.153.40 to 96.7.40.16
Milestone ’ 26.04.2011 From Sweden
to Europe
From Teliasonera Ab
to Akamai Technologies
80.239.206.32 to 92.123.153.40
Milestone ‘ 26.04.2011 From Europe
to Sweden
From Akamai Technologies
to Teliasonera Ab
92.123.153.40 to 80.239.206.32
Milestone 26.04.2011 From United States, Cambridge
to Europe
From Akamai Technologies
to Akamai Technologies
72.247.244.96 to 92.123.153.40
Milestone 26.04.2011 From United States
to United States, Cambridge
From Global Crossing
to Akamai Technologies
64.212.198.19 to 72.247.244.96
Milestone Ž 23.04.2011 From Europe
to United States
From Akamai Technologies
to Global Crossing
92.123.153.40 to 64.212.198.19
Milestone 23.04.2011 From United States, Cambridge
to Europe
From Akamai Technologies
to Akamai Technologies
96.17.106.80 to 92.123.153.40
Milestone Œ 23.04.2011 From Europe
to United States, Cambridge
From Akamai Technologies
to Akamai Technologies
92.123.153.40 to 96.17.106.80
Milestone ‹ 23.04.2011 From United States, Kalamazoo
to Europe
From Akamai Technologies
to Akamai Technologies
72.246.43.11 to 92.123.153.40
Milestone Š 23.04.2011 From United States, Englewood
to United States, Kalamazoo
From Ntt America
to Akamai Technologies
168.143.241.10 to 72.246.43.11
Milestone ‰ 18.04.2011 From Europe
to United States, Englewood
From Akamai Technologies
to Ntt America
195.245.127.137 to 168.143.241.10
Milestone ˆ 18.04.2011 From United States, Cambridge
to Europe
From Akamai Technologies
to Akamai Technologies
96.17.106.80 to 195.245.127.137
Milestone ‡ 18.04.2011 From Europe
to United States, Cambridge
From Akamai Technologies
to Akamai Technologies
195.245.127.137 to 96.17.106.80
Milestone † 18.04.2011 From United States, Kalamazoo
to Europe
From Akamai Technologies
to Akamai Technologies
72.246.43.11 to 195.245.127.137
Milestone … 18.04.2011 From United States, Englewood
to United States, Kalamazoo
From Ntt America
to Akamai Technologies
168.143.241.10 to 72.246.43.11
Milestone „ 16.04.2011 From United Kingdom, Cambridge
to United States, Englewood
From Cable & Wireless Telecommunication Services Gmbh
to Ntt America
195.59.122.152 to 168.143.241.10
Milestone ƒ 16.04.2011 From United States, Englewood
to United Kingdom, Cambridge
From Ntt America
to Cable & Wireless Telecommunication Services Gmbh
168.143.241.10 to 195.59.122.152
Milestone ‚ 16.04.2011 From Sweden
to United States, Englewood
From Teliasonera Ab
to Ntt America
80.239.206.32 to 168.143.241.10
Milestone 16.04.2011 From United States, Cambridge
to Sweden
From Akamai Technologies
to Teliasonera Ab
72.247.244.96 to 80.239.206.32
Milestone € 16.04.2011 From Japan
to United States, Cambridge
From Ntt Communications Corporation
to Akamai Technologies
61.213.189.10 to 72.247.244.96
Milestone  27.03.2011 From Europe
to Japan
From Akamai Technologies
to Ntt Communications Corporation
92.123.153.16 to 61.213.189.10
Milestone ~ 27.03.2011 From United States, Cambridge
to Europe
From France Telecom
to Akamai Technologies
81.52.250.88 to 92.123.153.16
Milestone } 27.03.2011 From Japan
to United States, Cambridge
From Ntt Communications Corporation
to France Telecom
61.213.189.10 to 81.52.250.88
Milestone | 27.03.2011 From United States, Cambridge
to Japan
From Akamai Technologies
to Ntt Communications Corporation
72.247.244.81 to 61.213.189.10
Milestone { 27.03.2011 From United States
to United States, Cambridge
From Qwest Communications
to Akamai Technologies
63.150.131.25 to 72.247.244.81
Milestone z 22.03.2011 From Europe
to United States
From Akamai Technologies
to Qwest Communications
92.123.153.16 to 63.150.131.25
Milestone y 22.03.2011 From United States, Englewood
to Europe
From Ntt America
to Akamai Technologies
168.143.241.40 to 92.123.153.16
Milestone x 22.03.2011 From United States
to United States, Englewood
From Qwest Communications
to Ntt America
63.150.131.25 to 168.143.241.40
Milestone w 22.03.2011 From United States, Cambridge
to United States
From Akamai Technologies
to Qwest Communications
72.247.244.81 to 63.150.131.25
Milestone v 22.03.2011 From United States
to United States, Cambridge
From Qwest Communications
to Akamai Technologies
63.150.131.25 to 72.247.244.81
Milestone u 20.03.2011 From Europe
to United States
From Akamai Technologies
to Qwest Communications
92.123.153.16 to 63.150.131.25
Milestone t 20.03.2011 From United States, Palatine
to Europe
From Global Crossing
to Akamai Technologies
206.57.116.137 to 92.123.153.16
Milestone s 20.03.2011 From United States, Englewood
to United States, Palatine
From Ntt America
to Global Crossing
168.143.241.40 to 206.57.116.137
Milestone r 20.03.2011 From United States, Cambridge
to United States, Englewood
From Akamai Technologies
to Ntt America
72.247.244.81 to 168.143.241.40
Milestone q 20.03.2011 From Sweden
to United States, Cambridge
From Teliasonera Ab
to Akamai Technologies
80.239.206.35 to 72.247.244.81
Milestone p 16.03.2011 From Europe
to Sweden
From Akamai Technologies
to Teliasonera Ab
92.123.153.16 to 80.239.206.35
Milestone o 16.03.2011 From Japan
to Europe
From Ntt Communications
to Akamai Technologies
117.104.138.24 to 92.123.153.16
Milestone n 16.03.2011 From Canada
to Japan
From Rogers Cable
to Ntt Communications
67.231.211.193 to 117.104.138.24
Milestone m 16.03.2011 From Japan
to Canada
From Ntt Communications
to Rogers Cable
117.104.138.24 to 67.231.211.193
Milestone l 10.03.2011 From Europe
to Japan
From Akamai Technologies
to Ntt Communications
92.123.153.16 to 117.104.138.24
Milestone k 10.03.2011 From United States, Palatine
to Europe
From Global Crossing
to Akamai Technologies
206.57.116.137 to 92.123.153.16
Milestone j 10.03.2011 From Europe
to United States, Palatine
From Akamai Technologies
to Global Crossing
92.123.153.16 to 206.57.116.137
Milestone i 10.03.2011 From Japan
to Europe
From Ntt Communications
to Akamai Technologies
117.104.138.24 to 92.123.153.16
Milestone h 10.03.2011 From United States, Brooklyn
to Japan
From Server Central Network
to Ntt Communications
216.246.87.64 to 117.104.138.24
Milestone g 05.03.2011 From Europe
to United States, Brooklyn
From Akamai Technologies
to Server Central Network
92.123.153.16 to 216.246.87.64
Milestone f 05.03.2011 From United States, Palatine
to Europe
From Global Crossing
to Akamai Technologies
206.57.116.137 to 92.123.153.16
Milestone e 05.03.2011 From United States, Brooklyn
to United States, Palatine
From Server Central Network
to Global Crossing
216.246.87.64 to 206.57.116.137
Milestone d 05.03.2011 From Canada
to United States, Brooklyn
From Rogers Cable
to Server Central Network
67.231.211.193 to 216.246.87.64
Milestone c 05.03.2011 From United States, Englewood
to Canada
From Ntt America
to Rogers Cable
168.143.241.40 to 67.231.211.193
Milestone b 01.03.2011 From Europe
to United States, Englewood
From Akamai Technologies
to Ntt America
92.123.153.16 to 168.143.241.40
Milestone a 01.03.2011 From United States, San diego
to Europe
From Akamai Technologies
to Akamai Technologies
60.254.185.152 to 92.123.153.16
Milestone ` 01.03.2011 From Europe
to United States, San diego
From Akamai Technologies
to Akamai Technologies
92.122.212.48 to 60.254.185.152
Milestone _ 01.03.2011 From Canada, Milton
to Europe
From Rogers Cable
to Akamai Technologies
66.185.85.178 to 92.122.212.48
Milestone ^ 01.03.2011 From United States, Cambridge
to Canada, Milton
From Akamai Technologies
to Rogers Cable
184.84.248.65 to 66.185.85.178
Milestone ] 24.02.2011 From United Kingdom, Cambridge
to United States, Cambridge
From Cable & Wireless Telecommunication Services Gmbh
to Akamai Technologies
195.59.44.56 to 184.84.248.65
Milestone \ 24.02.2011 From United States, San diego
to United Kingdom, Cambridge
From Akamai Technologies
to Cable & Wireless Telecommunication Services Gmbh
60.254.185.152 to 195.59.44.56
Milestone [ 24.02.2011 From Europe
to United States, San diego
From Akamai Technologies
to Akamai Technologies
92.122.212.41 to 60.254.185.152
Milestone Z 24.02.2011 From Canada, Milton
to Europe
From Rogers Cable
to Akamai Technologies
66.185.85.178 to 92.122.212.41
Milestone Y 24.02.2011 From United States, Cambridge
to Canada, Milton
From Akamai Technologies
to Rogers Cable
184.84.248.65 to 66.185.85.178
Milestone X 20.02.2011 From Europe
to United States, Cambridge
From Akamai Technologies
to Akamai Technologies
92.123.153.16 to 184.84.248.65
Milestone W 20.02.2011 From United States, San diego
to Europe
From Akamai Technologies
to Akamai Technologies
60.254.185.152 to 92.123.153.16
Milestone V 20.02.2011 From Europe
to United States, San diego
From Akamai Technologies
to Akamai Technologies
92.122.212.41 to 60.254.185.152
Milestone U 20.02.2011 From Sweden
to Europe
From Teliasonera Ab
to Akamai Technologies
213.155.158.48 to 92.122.212.41
Milestone T 20.02.2011 From United States, Cambridge
to Sweden
From Akamai Technologies
to Teliasonera Ab
184.84.248.65 to 213.155.158.48
Milestone S 17.02.2011 From Europe
to United States, Cambridge
From Akamai Technologies
to Akamai Technologies
92.122.208.114 to 184.84.248.65
Milestone R 17.02.2011 From United States, San diego
to Europe
From Akamai Technologies
to Akamai Technologies
60.254.185.152 to 92.122.208.114
Milestone Q 17.02.2011 From Europe
to United States, San diego
From Akamai Technologies
to Akamai Technologies
92.122.212.41 to 60.254.185.152
Milestone P 17.02.2011 From Korea, Republic Of, Seoul
to Europe
From Korea Telecom
to Akamai Technologies
220.90.198.40 to 92.122.212.41
Milestone O 17.02.2011 From Sweden
to Korea, Republic Of, Seoul
From Teliasonera Ab
to Korea Telecom
80.239.206.35 to 220.90.198.40
Milestone N 10.02.2011 From Europe
to Sweden
From Akamai Technologies
to Teliasonera Ab
92.123.153.16 to 80.239.206.35
Milestone M 10.02.2011 From United States
to Europe
From Global Crossing
to Akamai Technologies
208.50.7.147 to 92.123.153.16
Milestone L 10.02.2011 From Sweden
to United States
From Teliasonera Ab
to Global Crossing
80.239.206.35 to 208.50.7.147
Milestone K 10.02.2011 From Canada
to Sweden
From Rogers Cable
to Teliasonera Ab
67.231.211.193 to 80.239.206.35
Milestone J 10.02.2011 From United States, Englewood
to Canada
From Ntt America
to Rogers Cable
168.143.241.40 to 67.231.211.193
Milestone I 05.02.2011 From Europe
to United States, Englewood
From Akamai Technologies
to Ntt America
92.122.208.114 to 168.143.241.40
Milestone H 05.02.2011 From United States, Cambridge
to Europe
From France Telecom
to Akamai Technologies
81.52.250.88 to 92.122.208.114
Milestone G 05.02.2011 From Europe
to United States, Cambridge
From Akamai Technologies
to France Telecom
92.122.212.41 to 81.52.250.88
Milestone F 05.02.2011 From Sweden
to Europe
From Teliasonera Ab
to Akamai Technologies
80.239.206.35 to 92.122.212.41
Milestone E 05.02.2011 From United States
to Sweden
From Global Crossing
to Teliasonera Ab
64.208.5.177 to 80.239.206.35
Milestone D 01.02.2011 From Europe
to United States
From Akamai Technologies
to Global Crossing
92.123.153.16 to 64.208.5.177
Milestone C 01.02.2011 From United States, Aurora
to Europe
From Ntt America
to Akamai Technologies
192.204.11.42 to 92.123.153.16
Milestone B 01.02.2011 From Europe
to United States, Aurora
From Akamai Technologies
to Ntt America
92.122.212.41 to 192.204.11.42
Milestone A 01.02.2011 From Canada
to Europe
From Rogers Cable
to Akamai Technologies
67.231.211.193 to 92.122.212.41

Website Latency (Ping Test)

Latency Tests

Check details on Ping Graph

Latency affects on the rate of exchange of network packets between the client (user's computer) and the webserver. The lower latency to webserver means the faster start of the processing of all requests to the webserver, and after all the faster page loading. According to our data the average latency to the web server is 17 ms (see details). Test was conducted from 5 different locations. Average latency rating of the website is good (81% websites are slower). For detailed latency stats from different locations, as well as time slices for a month, 3 months and 6 months and more visit Ping Test Graph. We also recommend to take a look at latency rating at the United states, Cambridge location. This will give you an idea about average latency values in the region. And the answer to the question of how good this result for the this website.

Latency History Graph

Compare Latency From
Usa
Germany, Frankfurt
Canada, Montreal
United Kingdom, Gloucester
The main purpose of the testing is a measuring the speed and rating the stability of the latency to this IP from around the world in comparison with sites of the region (the city).
The chart will appear within this DIV. This text will be replaced by the chart.
 Usa, NY, New York
 Usa, Florida, Tampa
 Germany, Frankfurt
 Canada, Montreal
 United Kingdom, Gloucester

Graph Legend

  • Maximum latency for current location, mouse over for the details.
  • Mimimal latency for current location, mouse over for the details (date, value, etc.)
  • Numbered vertical lines indicate the change of IP for the current site
  • Data Loss
Compare Latency From
Usa
Germany, Frankfurt
Canada, Montreal
United Kingdom, Gloucester
The main purpose of the testing is a measuring the speed and rating the stability of the latency to this IP from around the world in comparison with sites of the region (the city).
The chart will appear within this DIV. This text will be replaced by the chart.
 Usa, NY, New York
 Usa, Florida, Tampa
 Germany, Frankfurt
 Canada, Montreal
 United Kingdom, Gloucester

Graph Legend

  • Maximum latency for current location, mouse over for the details.
  • Mimimal latency for current location, mouse over for the details (date, value, etc.)
  • Numbered vertical lines indicate the change of IP for the current site
  • Data Loss
Compare Latency From
Usa
Germany, Frankfurt
Canada, Montreal
United Kingdom, Gloucester
The main purpose of the testing is a measuring the speed and rating the stability of the latency to this IP from around the world in comparison with sites of the region (the city).
The chart will appear within this DIV. This text will be replaced by the chart.
 Usa, NY, New York
 Usa, Florida, Tampa
 Germany, Frankfurt
 Canada, Montreal
 United Kingdom, Gloucester

Graph Legend

  • Maximum latency for current location, mouse over for the details.
  • Mimimal latency for current location, mouse over for the details (date, value, etc.)
  • Numbered vertical lines indicate the change of IP for the current site
  • Data Loss
Compare Latency From
Usa
Germany, Frankfurt
Canada, Montreal
United Kingdom, Gloucester
The main purpose of the testing is a measuring the speed and rating the stability of the latency to this IP from around the world in comparison with sites of the region (the city).
The chart will appear within this DIV. This text will be replaced by the chart.
 Usa, NY, New York
 Usa, Florida, Tampa
 Germany, Frankfurt
 Canada, Montreal
 United Kingdom, Gloucester

Graph Legend

  • Maximum latency for current location, mouse over for the details.
  • Mimimal latency for current location, mouse over for the details (date, value, etc.)
  • Numbered vertical lines indicate the change of IP for the current site
  • Data Loss

How to read the graph's data

This graph represents a detailed statistics of website latency. Periodical measurements give a complete picture of website availability from the different areas of the planet. Particular attention is given to the expansion of our testing servers around the world, in order to test the site availability and latency in those locations where most of your visitors are. Of course, the faster access to the site means users get content faster. It means less bounce (bounce rate) and faster ads delivering (and therefore better performance CTR, eCPM). This is even more important given the fact that we've detected Google Adsense ad network code on this site. Ultimately, the best availability of the site gives you an edge over your competitors. More information can be read on our page about the importance of the latency speed for the website speed up.

Compare Latency Statistic

Compare latency


vs

Our Servers
Usa
NY, New York
Florida, Tampa
Germany, Frankfurt
Canada, Montreal
United Kingdom, Gloucester

Dynamic of the Latency Changes for the website from various locations.

Location Last check 7 day change 1 month change 3 month change 6 month change
 Usa
NY, New York 27 ms 38%
61/99 ms
Florida, Tampa 6 ms 58%
34/80 ms
 Germany
Frankfurt 29 ms 65%
28/81 ms
 Canada
Montreal 11 ms 15%
41/48 ms
 United Kingdom
Gloucester 12 ms 33%
8/6 ms

Fragment of Cambridge latency speed rating table for this website

The table is constructed according to the data from the US datacenters

# Domain Compare Ping Provider
1. Nseindia.com 8 ms Akamai Technologies
2. Webkinznews.com 9 ms Akamai Technologies
3. Cat-view.com 9 ms Akamai Technologies
... ... ... ... ...
11. Marriott.de 16 ms Akamai Technologies
12. Marriott.com.cn 16 ms Akamai Technologies
13. Rediff.com 17 ms Akamai Technologies
14. Wired.com 19 ms Nlayer Communications
15. Bestbuy.com 23 ms Akamai Technologies
... ... ... ... ...
192. Usandeep.com 66 ms
6 % Loss
Lycos
... ... ... ... ...
241. Flybridge.com
100 % Loss
One Communications Corporation

Why the low latency is important with this site as an example

To display this website browser needs to download 13 objects. Though modern browsers use parallel connection now, we'll simplify the conditions and calculate the time spent by the browser for these sites in a single-threaded mode. Time required to establish HTTP connection only:
3 * website latency * website objects
+ preparation of the webserver response. Number 3 in the formula is a three phase of a TCP connection: sending a SYN request from the client to the server, sending ASK + SYN from the server to the client and the ASK sending from the client to the server. Though we can not calculate the time for a webserver response, the total time for sending and receiving requests for each of the object will be:
3 * 17 ms * 13 objects = 0 sec
Of course, modern browsers use several simultaneous connections to download content from a domain (from 2 to 8 at the time of writing this document). And in some browsers the number of connections can be set manually (Opera). But, if you impose these data on the first site Nseindia.com from the latency table for the city Cambridge, it turns out that the difference in time only for the sending and receiving requests to the web server could be: 0.35 sec. Sure, making such calculations must always take into account the audience site, and always make an accent on the fact that the server should always be so geographically closer to the primary audience as it possible. Also we recommend to pay attention to an article about importance of the latency on our site.

DNS Lookup Speed

Browser should lookup domain name and get IP address of the server (184.84.248.49) before downloading the page. We test DNS resolve for this domain from 5 locations. That's how we've got the average time of receiving IP: 0.05s (which is better than 96% of all sites). For more detailed stats look at DNS tests graph and DNS resolve page for United states, Cambridge location (Average value on the widget is an average DNS resolve time for websites hosted at the same location).

DNS History Graph

Compare DNS From Servers
Usa
Germany, Frankfurt
Canada, Montreal
United Kingdom, Gloucester
The main purpose of the testing is a measuring the speed and rating the stability of the latency to this IP from around the world in comparison with sites of the region (the city).
The chart will appear within this DIV. This text will be replaced by the chart.
 Usa, NY, New York
 Usa, Florida, Tampa
 Germany, Frankfurt
 Canada, Montreal
 United Kingdom, Gloucester

Graph Legend

  • Maximum latency for current location, mouse over for the details.
  • Mimimal latency for current location, mouse over for the details (date, value, etc.)
  • Milestones indicate the change of IP for the current site
  • Data Loss
Compare DNS From Servers
Usa
Germany, Frankfurt
Canada, Montreal
United Kingdom, Gloucester
The main purpose of the testing is a measuring the speed and rating the stability of the latency to this IP from around the world in comparison with sites of the region (the city).
The chart will appear within this DIV. This text will be replaced by the chart.
 Usa, NY, New York
 Usa, Florida, Tampa
 Germany, Frankfurt
 Canada, Montreal
 United Kingdom, Gloucester

Graph Legend

  • Maximum latency for current location, mouse over for the details.
  • Mimimal latency for current location, mouse over for the details (date, value, etc.)
  • Milestones indicate the change of IP for the current site
  • Data Loss
Compare DNS From Servers
Usa
Germany, Frankfurt
Canada, Montreal
United Kingdom, Gloucester
The main purpose of the testing is a measuring the speed and rating the stability of the latency to this IP from around the world in comparison with sites of the region (the city).
The chart will appear within this DIV. This text will be replaced by the chart.
 Usa, NY, New York
 Usa, Florida, Tampa
 Germany, Frankfurt
 Canada, Montreal
 United Kingdom, Gloucester

Graph Legend

  • Maximum latency for current location, mouse over for the details.
  • Mimimal latency for current location, mouse over for the details (date, value, etc.)
  • Milestones indicate the change of IP for the current site
  • Data Loss
Compare DNS From Servers
Usa
Germany, Frankfurt
Canada, Montreal
United Kingdom, Gloucester
The main purpose of the testing is a measuring the speed and rating the stability of the latency to this IP from around the world in comparison with sites of the region (the city).
The chart will appear within this DIV. This text will be replaced by the chart.
 Usa, NY, New York
 Usa, Florida, Tampa
 Germany, Frankfurt
 Canada, Montreal
 United Kingdom, Gloucester

Graph Legend

  • Maximum latency for current location, mouse over for the details.
  • Mimimal latency for current location, mouse over for the details (date, value, etc.)
  • Milestones indicate the change of IP for the current site
  • Data Loss

Compare DNS Speed

Compare DNS Lookup


vs

Our Servers
Usa
NY, New York
Florida, Tampa
Germany, Frankfurt
Canada, Montreal
United Kingdom, Gloucester

The table below shows the dynamic of the DNS Lookup speed changes for the website from various locations.

Location Last check 7 day change 1 month change 3 month change 6 month change
 Usa
NY, New York 65 ms 6%
141/150 ms
Florida, Tampa 91 ms 48%
113/218 ms
 Germany
Frankfurt 53 ms 52%
95/198 ms
 Canada
Montreal 9 ms 22%
42/54 ms
 United Kingdom
Gloucester 8 ms

Fragment of Cambridge DNS Speed rating table for this website

The table is constructed according to the data from the US datacenters

# Domain Compare DNS Resolve Speed Provider
1. Solonline.org 30 ms Continental Broadband Pennsylvania
2. Seul.org 36 ms Massachusetts Institute Of Technology
3. Body1.com 39 ms Comcast Business Communications
... ... ... ... ...
8. Badwarebusters.org 45 ms Harvard University
9. Futureoftheinternet.org 45 ms Massachusetts Institute Of Technology
10. Rediff.com 45 ms Akamai Technologies
11. Herdict.org 47 ms Harvard University
12. Diabetes1.org 47 ms Comcast Business Communications
... ... ... ... ...
241. Webkinznews.com 1791 ms Akamai Technologies

Page Speed Test

Content-Type's Weights
 
 
Content-Type's Weights by Hosts
 
 
Downloading page itself is the final stage of the testing. Actually, this is the last stage, after which page is displayed completely for user. The download speed depends on many factors. Main factors are the following: the width of the bandwidth up to the domain, the number of simultaneous download threads, speed of the server, a distance between user and domain web server. Recent measurements have shown the speed of page download for this domain is 24.172Kb/s (which is better than 11% of all sites in this region). For more detailed stats check out report for Cambridge hosted websites.

 
 
 

Page Speed

Page Speed is a key factor in the website speed estimations (along with DNS lookup speed and website latency). Speed of the page loading, sophisticated subdomains usage for static content (images, css), optimized code (html, js), hosting on fast servers with good latency to its audience leads to good results and, ultimately, to a good website profitability.

While conducting tests we emulate a visit your website using the browser Firefox 3.5.6. Test results of the page loading listed in this table:

Pagespeed Flash Table

Ways to improve website performance

Once the document (website's main page) has been downloaded, we analyze it. It allows us to give webmasters some recommendations on how to optimize page load speed. We analyze the internal and external factors.

Reduse DNS Resolve

Browsers must resolve site's hosts to display all of the elements of the Rediff.com's page. Every domain name resolve requires a time, which precedes the load from a specific domain. You can speed up page loading by reducing the number of hosts, from which elements of the page are loaded.
 Host www.rediff.com (1 file)
 Host imworld.rediff.com (6 files)
 Host b.scorecardresearch.com (2 files)
 Host metric.us.rediff.com (1 file)
 Host ads.rediff.com (1 file)
 Host datastore.rediff.com (1 file)
 Host socialimg.rediff.com (1 file)

Enable GZIP Compression

This is a good practice to give the user content in compressed form. We've detected 0 Kb of content that could be compressed. By compressing content you can achieve the size of ~ 0 Kb (saving 0 Kb). This would accelerate the page loading speed and would positively impact the bandwidth savings in Akamai Technologies.
http://metric.us.rediff.com/www.rediff.com/?rkey=130621. File size 0 Kb and you can save up to 0 Kb

Alternate text for the images.

As you may already know, search engine that indexes your pages, do not have eyes. And all content you are trying to display on your site is just HTML & CSS code, images, Flash, etc for the robots. It is It's extremely important to describe each of the objects more datailed using ALT, TITLE and other tags.

Our robot has determined that the rediff.com page has 14 images, which has no tag ALT. Tag ALT is a text field, that specifies an alternate text for an image. But not only. Search engines consider this tag as a supplemental result for assessing the content of your page entirely. Do not ignore it!

For example your page has this code:
178.   <img class="homesprite morearrow1" src="http://imworld.rediff.com/worldrediff/pix/blank.gif">
We recommend you use rich img code in that place:
178.   <img class="homesprite morearrow1" src="http://imworld.rediff.com/worldrediff/pix/blank.gif" alt="stock market news">


P.S. We used keyword for this image that seemed to us most important for your page. But you can go ahead and give to each of 14 images an ALT text. This problem requires responsible approach. No need to put the same text at alt tag of the all images. Imagine that the pictures do not show and try to make sure that users understand what is shown on the picture based on the alt tag

Specify image dimensions

The browser needs to know the actual dimensions of image (width and height) to quickly render webpage.

We have detected that the 22 images has no width and height,2 images has missed the height.

If you do not specify the width and/or height, then in order to correctly display the image browser needs to download it and only then put on the screen. Otherwise, there is a chance browser will display elements under the picture inappropriately as well as the possible presence of "jumping" effect of the page content (until the page load is finished).

We provide below example of how to define the image http://b.scorecardresearch.com/p?c1=2&c2=6035613&cv=2.0&cj=1 dimensions:
712.   <img src="http://b.scorecardresearch.com/p?c1=2&c2=6035613&cv=2.0&cj=1" width="IMAGE_WIDTH_HERE" height="IMAGE_HEIGHT_HERE">
349.   <img src="http://socialimg.rediff.com/image.php?pageid=158031&type=pages" title="Bollywood Trailers" width="84" height="IMAGE_HEIGHT_HERE">

Using H1 tag

Avoid frequent use of the <Ð1> tag. Our robot has found 6 <Ð1> tags in the document's body. We recommend you use one <Ð1> tag per page only.

Use the TITLE for A tag

As we have already mentioned, search engine bots can not see the site like a people do it. They more focused on the descriptions of certain page elements. That's why we strongly recommend use TITLE operator in the "A" tag. This operator not only describes the page referenced by the page more detailed, but also takes part in the page describing. For example, you have the link on your website:
66.   <a id="mobicon" href="javascript:;;" onmouseover="findPosXY('mobicon','mobtip',-125,15);" onmouseout="hideDiv1('mobtip');" name="mobicon">Visit us on mobile</a>
We suggest you to remake it in this way:
66.   <a id="mobicon" href="javascript:;;" onmouseover="findPosXY('mobicon','mobtip',-125,15);" onmouseout="hideDiv1('mobtip');" name="mobicon" title="stock market">Visit us on mobile</a>
Of course, you can (and should) use more proper phrase instead of the "stock market" that describes the link javascript:;;.


Our Mailbox © 2009 — 2011 SiteSpeedLab & SiteSpeedLab.com
Be Quick or Be Dead